Olmstead Under Attack

WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH OLMSTEAD RIGHT NOW?

An easy-to-understand guide to the decision, the recent federal action, and what disability organizations are saying and doing.

THE SHORT VERSION

On June 18, 2026, four days before the 27th anniversary of the Olmstead decision, the Department of Justice issued a memo that disability advocates say narrows how federal law applies to community-based services.

Since then, the federal government has gone further. DOJ said it will no longer rely on its own Olmstead guidance, and it joined several states in a lawsuit that ended on September 23, 2026, with a federal court removing community integration language from HHS’s Section 504 regulations nationwide.

The ADA has not changed. Olmstead has not been overturned. But how the law is interpreted and enforced matters enormously to disabled people’s daily lives, and this memo is now the official position of the United States government.

WHY PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT OLMSTEAD RIGHT NOW

A recent Department of Justice legal interpretation has raised concern across the disability rights community because it appears to take a narrower view of how strongly federal law protects access to community-based services under Olmstead v. L.C.

Disability advocates and organizations argue this reflects a broader pattern of limiting or weakening how disability rights protections are enforced in practice, even when the underlying law itself has not changed.
Olmstead has been one of the key legal foundations for community living rights for more than two decades. Because of that, changes in how it is interpreted or enforced can have real consequences for whether people are able to access services in the community or are pushed toward more segregated settings.

Links:

WHAT IS COMMUNITY INTEGRATION?

Community integration is the idea that disabled people should be able to live and receive services in typical community settings rather than being unnecessarily separated into institutions or segregated systems.
This includes:

  • Living in homes instead of institutions when appropriate
  • Receiving services in community settings
  • Having access to everyday public life
  • Having meaningful choice in where and how support is provided

It is a core principle of modern disability rights law.

Links:

WHAT WAS THE OLMSTEAD DECISION?

In 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Olmstead v. L.C. The case involved two women, Lois Curtis and Elaine Wilson, who were kept in institutional settings even though professionals determined they could be served in the community. The Court held that unnecessary segregation of disabled people can violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. Over time, Olmstead became a key legal foundation for expanding home and community-based services and reducing unnecessary institutionalization. For nearly three decades, courts, federal agencies, and both Republican and Democratic administrations applied Olmstead to push states toward community-based services. By 2023, 8.4 million Americans were receiving home and community-based services through Medicaid, many as a direct result of Olmstead enforcement.

Source: 

NPR, June 20, 2026 DOJ memo stokes fear among disability advocates of a return to institutionalization

Links:

President Obama with Lois Curtis in the Oval Office

President Barack Obama looks at a piece of art presented to him by artist Lois Curtis, center, during their meeting in the Oval Office, June 20, 2011. Joining them are, from left, Janet Hill and Jessica Long, from the Georgia Department of Labor, and Lee Sanders, of Briggs and Associates. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

WHAT CHANGED IN RECENT FEDERAL INTERPRETATION?

A recent Department of Justice legal interpretation, dated June 18, 2026, has raised concern across the disability rights community because it argues that community-based services are authorized by states, not required by federal law, directly contradicting how Olmstead has been understood and enforced for nearly three decades.

Primary source

The memo is the primary source of this interpretation
Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) Memorandum, June 2026
This memorandum is an internal legal interpretation of how the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 apply to state obligations around community-based services.

It does not change the ADA or overturn Olmstead, but it may influence:

  • How DOJ interprets the ADA’s integration mandate
  • Whether DOJ continues to uphold existing Olmstead settlements and agreements with states
  • The positions the federal government takes in court
  • How federal agencies treat their own regulations and guidance on community integration
  • How disability advocates describe it:
    • Advocates and disability rights organizations have described the memo as reflecting a narrower interpretation of federal obligations related to community integration
  • The key difference is how those obligations are understood:
    Earlier interpretations have generally supported stronger enforcement of community integration requirements under the ADA and Olmstead, with both Republican and Democratic administrations treating the integration mandate as settled law.

The newer interpretation is widely understood by advocates to emphasize preventing unlawful institutionalization rather than affirmatively requiring broader access to community-based services. Notably, the memo itself acknowledges this reading is “out of step with the common understanding of that decision within the courts.”

Important context:Timeline of federal actions since June 2026

This was not a surprise. Disability and aging organizations have been warning Congress since at least April 2025 that proposed Medicaid cuts in the budget reconciliation process were dangerous and life-threatening. Hundreds of national, state, and local organizations urged Congress to reject the proposals. The May 2025 letter from the Consortium for Constituents with Disabilities and the Disability and Aging Collaborative [Link to External PDF: Government Statement] named specific provisions that would reduce home and community-based services and push people toward costlier institutional care.

April 28, 2025 letter [Link to External PDF: Government Statement]

The memo arrives alongside deep Medicaid cuts from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which legal experts say will force states to cut community-based services. Legal experts told NPR that the memo effectively gives states permission to shift toward institutionalization in response to those cuts, even though research consistently shows institutional care costs states significantly more than community-based supports.

  • June 18, 2026: DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel issued its memo arguing that the ADA and Section 504 do not require states to provide services in community settings. The memo acknowledges this reading is “out of step with the common understanding of that decision within the federal courts.”
  • June 23, 2026: The Latonya Reeves Freedom Act was introduced in Congress (H.R. 9401 in the House, S. 4865 in the Senate). It would create a right to community integration written directly into federal law.
  • June 24, 2026: Senate Resolution 790, honoring the 27th anniversary of Olmstead and calling on DOJ to rescind the memo, was introduced and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • July 20, 2026: DOJ published a notice in the Federal Register saying it will not rely on its longstanding Olmstead guidance when enforcing Title II of the ADA, calling that guidance “not enforceable” and stating plans to revisit it under a narrower reading of the law.
  • August 31, 2026: DOJ, representing HHS, joined Texas, Florida, and Alaska in asking a federal court to settle the case Texas v. Kennedy by removing community integration provisions from HHS’s 2024 Section 504 regulations.
  • September 2026: 18 governors signed a letter opposing the federal government’s retreat from protecting the right to community integration.
  • September 23, 2026: The court granted the request and entered final judgment in Texas v. Kennedy. The order removed the community integration provision and other “most integrated setting” references from HHS’s Section 504 regulations. It applies nationwide. It does not change Section 504 itself, the ADA, or Olmstead.
  • September 28, 2026: Representatives Debbie Dingell (D) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R), co-chairs of the House Bipartisan Disability Caucus, introduced House Resolution 1586, affirming that Olmstead reflects what Congress intended: that disabled people should live and receive services in their communities. Cosponsors include Representatives Kean (R), Lawler (R), Wilson (R), Scanlon (D), and Simon (D).

The ADA has not changed.
The Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C. has not been overturned.
Federal interpretation can still affect enforcement priorities and legal arguments, even without changing the underlying law.

WHY DISABILITY ORGANIZATIONS ARE CONCERNED

Many disability organizations are concerned about long-term impacts on enforcement and access to services, rather than immediate legal changes.

Common concerns include:

  • Reduced pressure on states to expand community-based services
  • Weakened enforcement of community integration requirements
  • Fewer legal tools to challenge unnecessary institutionalization
  • Increased barriers to accessing home and community-based supports
  • Active DOJ Olmstead enforcement, which produced consent decrees and agreements in nearly a dozen states, is likely to stop
  • Federal regulations are already changing. HHS’s Section 504 regulations lost their community integration language through the Texas v. Kennedy order, and the memo calls on federal agencies to rescind similar regulations and guidance.
  • Some advocates point to a footnote in the memo suggesting these laws have contributed to homelessness, and connect the memo to a 2025 executive order promoting civil commitment and long-term institutional placement of unhoused people.

As The Arc put it, disability rights are not always weakened by a single repeal. Sometimes they are weakened through legal memos, withdrawn guidance, reduced enforcement, and regulations rolled back one at a time.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN RIGHT NOW?

There is no change to the ADA, Section 504, or the Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision. One federal regulation has changed: the September 23 order in Texas v. Kennedy removed community integration language from HHS’s Section 504 regulations nationwide. Federal interpretation can also matter because it can influence:

  • How aggressively are rights enforced
  • Future cases are argued in court
  • How states design service systems
  • How accessible community services are in practice

If federal enforcement weakens, disabled people and advocates may have to rely more heavily on private lawsuits, state advocacy, and disability rights organizations to protect these rights. This is why many organizations are paying close attention now.

Links:

WHAT YOU CAN DO RIGHT NOW

Call or fax your U.S. House representative and both senators.